[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131024145025.GA1493@krava.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:50:25 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnaldo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, patches@...aro.org,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...oldbits.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM64: perf: wire up perf_regs and unwind support
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 04:54:38PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
SNIP
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> index 75b93d7..15a69a5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> @@ -29,11 +29,17 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
> NO_PERF_REGS := 0
> LIBUNWIND_LIBS = -lunwind -lunwind-x86_64
> endif
> +
> ifeq ($(ARCH),arm)
> NO_PERF_REGS := 0
> LIBUNWIND_LIBS = -lunwind -lunwind-arm
> endif
I dont see above 'ifeq' in acme's or in tip tree, so hunk
below fails to apply.. what tree was this based on?
otherwise the change looks good to me
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists