[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFrcx1=VjRbdTet2_k=w36YSgk3x+cCoNwZ1QYFpNqCymoVa0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:14:19 +0200
From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Arnaldo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...oldbits.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM64: perf: wire up perf_regs and unwind support
Hi Jiri, Will,
On 24 October 2013 16:50, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 04:54:38PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
>> index 75b93d7..15a69a5 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
>> @@ -29,11 +29,17 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
>> NO_PERF_REGS := 0
>> LIBUNWIND_LIBS = -lunwind -lunwind-x86_64
>> endif
>> +
>> ifeq ($(ARCH),arm)
>> NO_PERF_REGS := 0
>> LIBUNWIND_LIBS = -lunwind -lunwind-arm
>> endif
>
> I dont see above 'ifeq' in acme's or in tip tree, so hunk
> below fails to apply.. what tree was this based on?
I am using 3.12-rc4. Let me rebase on the latest mainline.
Will, what do you think? I will post a rebased version asap.
> otherwise the change looks good to me
Great, thanks for reviewing!
>
> jirka
Jean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists