[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1382713941.2954.19.camel@flatline.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:12:21 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should
not stop
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:36 +0900, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
> systemd |auditd
> -------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
> ... |
> -> audit_receive |...
> -> mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex) |-> audit_receive
> ... -> audit_log_start | -> mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex)
> -> wait_for_auditd | // wait for systemd
> -> schedule_timeout(60*HZ) |
Ugggh, definitely a problem. Adding a similar hack to systemd really
does not seem like an acceptable answer. It seems to me that in
audit_receive_msg()
case AUDIT_USER:
case AUDIT_FIRST_USER_MSG ... AUDIT_LAST_USER_MSG:
case AUDIT_FIRST_USER_MSG2 ... AUDIT_LAST_USER_MSG2:
we do not need to hold the audit_cmd_mutex. So a quick and dirty patch
should be to just drop the mutex there (and we need to verify there
aren't issues running the audit_filter_user() without the lock). That
will take care of systemd and anything USING audit. It still means that
you could race with something configuring audit and auditd shutting
down. Seems like a good quick and dirty 'fix' while we work on a better
fix...
To take care of that I think maybe we could drop the cmd_mutex every
time we call audit_log_start. That's not necessarily going to be
pretty. Maybe make a new switch at the top of the function which knows
which operations we are going to have to allocate an audit_buffer. Drop
the lock, allocate the buffer, then retake the lock to finish running
audit_receive_msg()....
Maybe that second option isn't so hard and we can go directly after that
instead of just dealing with userspace audit messages?
Thoughts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists