[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131025193812.GA6256@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:38:12 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/hvc-console: Make it work with HVM
guests.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:43:54PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 17:30 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> > I'm sure the solution "move xen call earlier" will come up in few mails,
> > so there was a discussion for swiotlb few weeks ago
> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/29/609). And the final decision was to
> > avoid specific Xen call in arch_setup.
>
> It wasn't so much a hard reject as a preference based on the need
> presented at the time.
>
> Perhaps a generic DT driven mechanism to detect hypervisors, called
> early, would be more acceptable?
>
> > Stefano, Ian, any opinion?
>
> The ifdef approach is a bit ugly, but if the other option doesn't work
> out I suppose we can live with it.
>
> But stepping back how/why is this function called on x86 when not
> running under Xen? Wouldn't the use have to be using console=hvc or
> earlyprintk=xen or something -- which strikes me as user error... IOW
> can we not just nuke the check
It shouldn't - ever. On x86 it is called from the early PV bootup code.
I occasionaly use it when developing/debugging and as such want it working
in HVM even during early bootup.
>
> Ian.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists