[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k3gx967f.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:59:16 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf tools: Split -g and --call-graph for record command
Hi Jiri,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 16:25:33 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Splitting -g and --call-graph for record command, so we could
> use '-g' with no option.
>
> The '-g' option now takes NO argument and enables the configured
> unwind method, which is currently the frame pointers method.
>
> It will be possible to configure unwind method via config
> file in upcoming patches.
>
> All current '-g' arguments is overtaken by --call-graph option.
$ perf record --call-graph none -- true
callchain: Unknown -g option value: none
It should be
callchain: Unknown --call-graph option value: none
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists