lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:15:17 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Shifei Ge <shifei10.ge@...sung.com>
To:	jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com
Cc:	?? <shu.tan@...sung.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs:fix truncate_partial_nodes bug

truncate_partial_nodes puts pages incorrectly in two cases.note that the value for argc 'depth' can only be 2 or 3(see truncate_inode_blocks --->truncate_partial_nodes ).
first case:err happened in the first 'for' loop
	assume depth is 2,when err happened,pages[0] is invalid,so this page don't need to be put when func return,there is no problem.
	but when depth is 3 ,pages isn't put correctly when pages[0] is valid and pages[1] is invalid.in this case,depth is set to 2(ref to statemnt depth = i + 1) ,and then 'goto fail'.
	in label 'fail', for (i = depth - 3; i >= 0; i--) cann't meet the condition because i=-1,so pages[0] cann't be put when func return.
second case:err happened in the second 'for' loop
	now,we've got pages[0] with argc 'depth' is 2 ,or we've got pages[0] and pages[1] with depth is 3.when err happend,we need 'goto fail' to put pages we've got.
	when depth is 2,in label 'fail',for (i = depth - 3; i >= 0; i--) cann't meet the condition because i=-1,so pages[0] cann't be put.
	when depth is 3,in label 'fail',for (i = depth - 3; i >= 0; i--) can only put pages[0],pages[1] also cann't be put.
notes 'depth' has been changed before first 'goto fail'(ref to statemnt depth = i + 1),so pass this modified 'depth' to trace_f2fs_truncate_partial_nodes is also incorrectly.

From 9de8efa31759ce86a032f5ad092d337b686ede06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Signed-off-by: Shifei Ge <shifei10.ge@...sung.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 304d5ce..9986930 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ static int truncate_partial_nodes(struct dnode_of_data *dn,
 	int err = 0;
 	int i;
 	int idx = depth - 2;
+	int dep = depth;
 
 	nid[0] = le32_to_cpu(ri->i_nid[offset[0] - NODE_DIR1_BLOCK]);
 	if (!nid[0])
@@ -663,11 +664,12 @@ static int truncate_partial_nodes(struct dnode_of_data *dn,
 	}
 	offset[idx]++;
 	offset[depth - 1] = 0;
+	depth--;
 fail:
-	for (i = depth - 3; i >= 0; i--)
+	for (i = depth - 2; i >= 0; i--)
 		f2fs_put_page(pages[i], 1);
 
-	trace_f2fs_truncate_partial_nodes(dn->inode, nid, depth, err);
+	trace_f2fs_truncate_partial_nodes(dn->inode, nid, dep, err);
 
 	return err;
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ