[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131028104458.GE4314@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:44:58 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andreas Werner <wernerandy@....de>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: MM: Add PAT Type write-through in combination with
mtrr
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The CLFLUSH is done afterwards (making it a use-once thing), so WB
> might still be faster and would avoid the PAT headache ...
Absolutely, that's why there's no need for a WT buffer at all, methinks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists