[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <526E421A.3090507@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 03:53:14 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andreas Werner <wernerandy@....de>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: MM: Add PAT Type write-through in combination with
mtrr
On 10/28/2013 03:51 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> If i mark the region WB and call clflush my system will crash without
>> any message, it just stop working.
>
> Yeah, I was wondering whether it's valid at all to mark IO memory as
> cacheable - with the lack of MESI transactions and all that ...
>
> So it's apparently not valid and we've got to live with WT as the
> 'best' caching/bursting method for reads.
>
On a lot of systems I'm not sure if even WT is legitimate.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists