[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <526DBEAA.4030707@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:32:26 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/core] ARM: Kconfig: allow full nohz CPU accounting
Hi Stephen,
On 10/18/2013 09:37 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/16, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:58:03AM -0700, tip-bot for Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Commit-ID: 31c1fc8187158cb80ccd57c19e024c55af901797
>>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/31c1fc8187158cb80ccd57c19e024c55af901797
>>> Author: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
>>> AuthorDate: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:28:22 -0700
>>> Committer: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>>> CommitDate: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:37:05 +0200
>>>
>>> ARM: Kconfig: allow full nohz CPU accounting
>>>
>>> With the 64-bit requirement removed from VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN,
>>> allow ARM platforms to enable it. Since VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN is a
>>> dependency for full NO_HZ, this allows ARM platforms to enable full
>>> NO_HZ as well.
>>
>> I realize that arm doesn't implement irq work raise. It hooks on the
>> timer to execute pending irq work. You'll need to implement arch_irq_work_raise()
>> and implement some sort of self IPI to trigger irq work. The full dynticks subsystem
>> relies on that to work correctly. It often use that to re-evaluate and possibly restart
>> the tick after scheduler, posix timer updates, etc...
>>
>> That notwithstanding that if you have no tick, tick based irq work can't
>> work.
>>
>
> Something like this? The only problem is that this latches on to
> the SMP support for IPIs. If CONFIG_SMP is disabled we won't get
> arch_irq_work_raise() but perhaps that isn't so big of a deal? Or
> we should think about exposing IPI support to UP systems on ARM.
Care to submit a proper patch for this to LAKML? or if you prefer I can
do it (keeping your authorship.) We need this for proper full NOHZ
support on ARM. Thanks.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists