[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131028171226.a06b0d5448200409fbd39aae@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:12:26 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...il.com>,
Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the
drm-intel-fixes tree
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:46:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> @@@ -1486,8 -1542,8 +1562,8 @@@ static void intel_edp_psr_setup(struct
> intel_edp_psr_write_vsc(intel_dp, &psr_vsc);
>
> /* Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking memup and hpd */
> - I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL(dev), EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL, EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> - EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD | EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
> + EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD);
>
> intel_dp->psr_setup_done = true;
> }
This last hunk is wrong. I fixed it up to do the reverse of the above.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists