[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <526E1EFA02000078000FD1E7@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:23:22 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <mingo@...e.hu>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<arjan@...ux.intel.com>, <linux@...ck-us.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: unify copy_from_user() size checking
>>> On 26.10.13 at 12:31, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> * Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to point out though that with __compiletime_object_size()
>> being restricted to gcc before 4.6, the whole construct is going to
>> become more and more pointless going forward. I would question
>> however that commit 2fb0815c9ee6b9ac50e15dd8360ec76d9fa46a2 ("gcc4:
>> disable __compiletime_object_size for GCC 4.6+") was really necessary,
>> and instead this should have been dealt with as is done here from the
>> beginning.
>
> Can we now revert 2fb0815c9ee6?
Afaict yes, but I certainly didn't test with all possible gcc versions.
So minimally everyone involved in getting that change in would be
good to be in agreement.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists