[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131029082546.GA17514@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:25:48 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Support arch_irq_work_raise() via self IPIs
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:00:58PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/28, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> writes:
> >
> > > This will allow the scheduler tick to be restarted if we're in
> > > full NOHZ mode.
> > >
> > > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
> > > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> >
> > Minor nit, but I'd prefer a more verbose changelog (I forget things
> > quickly and like to rely on changelogs for my memory.) Probably worth
> > adding something like: "By default, irq_work is tied to the tick
> > processing (update_process_times()) but in full NOHZ mode, no tick means
> > no IRQ work. In order for IRQ work to be done in full NOHZ mode, a
> > self-IPI is used to process IRQ work."
> >
> > Other than the changelog nit, patch looks good, feel free to add
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
> >
> > If Russell is OK with this, it can go to his patch system.
> >
>
> Fair enough. This is what I came up with. I'll send it off to the
> patch tracker in about 12 hours if nobody else has anymore
> comments.
>
> ----8<-----
> ARM: Support arch_irq_work_raise() via self IPIs
>
> By default, IRQ work is run from the tick interrupt (see
> irq_work_run() in update_process_times()). When we're in full
> NOHZ mode, restarting the tick requires the use of IRQ work and
> if the only place we run IRQ work is in the tick interrupt we
> have an unbreakable cycle. Implement arch_irq_work_raise() via
> self IPIs to break this cycle and get the tick started again.
> Note that we implement this via IPIs which are only available on
> SMP builds. This shouldn't be a problem because full NOHZ is only
> supported on SMP builds anyway.
Nice description!
Thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists