[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874n7zq53a.fsf@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:55:53 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Support arch_irq_work_raise() via self IPIs
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> writes:
> On 10/28, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> writes:
>>
>> > This will allow the scheduler tick to be restarted if we're in
>> > full NOHZ mode.
>> >
>> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
>> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> Minor nit, but I'd prefer a more verbose changelog (I forget things
>> quickly and like to rely on changelogs for my memory.) Probably worth
>> adding something like: "By default, irq_work is tied to the tick
>> processing (update_process_times()) but in full NOHZ mode, no tick means
>> no IRQ work. In order for IRQ work to be done in full NOHZ mode, a
>> self-IPI is used to process IRQ work."
>>
>> Other than the changelog nit, patch looks good, feel free to add
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
>>
>> If Russell is OK with this, it can go to his patch system.
>>
>
> Fair enough. This is what I came up with. I'll send it off to the
> patch tracker in about 12 hours if nobody else has anymore
> comments.
Nice description, thanks for the respin.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists