[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1406112.LRdFoqkugQ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:01:40 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Always rescan the slot for new devices
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 02:40:36 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Commit 2dc4128 (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Avoid doing too much for spurious
> notifies) changed the enable_slot() to check return value of pci_scan_slot()
> and if it is zero return early from the function. It means that there were
> no new devices in this particular slot.
>
> However, if a device appeared deeper in the hierarchy the code now ignores
> it causing things like Thunderbolt chaining fail to recognize new devices.
>
> The problem with Alex Williamson's machine was solved with commit
> a47d8c8 (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Avoid parent bus rescans on spurious device
> checks) and hence we should be able to restore the original functionality
> that we always rescan on bus check notification.
>
> On a device check notification we still check what acpiphp_rescan_slot()
> returns and on zero bail out early.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
So, this is a revert of commit a47d8c8, correct?
Rafael
> ---
> Alex,
>
> Are you able to check if your machine still works and doesn't slow down
> during boot after this patch is applied?
>
> Thanks.
>
> drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> index be12fbf..1ea7523 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> @@ -552,9 +552,8 @@ static void __ref enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
> struct acpiphp_func *func;
> int max, pass;
> LIST_HEAD(add_list);
> - int nr_found;
>
> - nr_found = acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
> + acpiphp_rescan_slot(slot);
> max = acpiphp_max_busnr(bus);
> for (pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++) {
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
> @@ -574,9 +573,6 @@ static void __ref enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
> }
> }
> __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
> - /* Nothing more to do here if there are no new devices on this bus. */
> - if (!nr_found && (slot->flags & SLOT_ENABLED))
> - return;
>
> acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
> acpiphp_set_hpp_values(bus);
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists