[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1310301615430.24686@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:30:31 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, tony@...mide.com, rnayak@...com,
marc.zyngier@....com, grant.likely@...aro.org,
mark.rutland@....com, robherring2@...il.com,
santosh.shilimkar@...com, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/7] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: CROSSBAR: Add support for
Crossbar IP
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Sricharan R wrote:
> +static inline const u32 allocate_free_irq(int cb_no)
I understand the "static inline" part, but "const u32" is more than
fishy. What's wrong with "static inline int" ?
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cb->int_max; i++) {
> + if (cb->irq_map[i] == IRQ_FREE) {
> + cb->irq_map[i] = cb_no;
> + return i;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +static int crossbar_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> + unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + unsigned long ret = 0;
Why do you need to initialize ret when you assign a value to it in the
next line?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists