[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1310301608380.24686@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:15:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, tony@...mide.com, rnayak@...com,
marc.zyngier@....com, grant.likely@...aro.org,
mark.rutland@....com, robherring2@...il.com,
santosh.shilimkar@...com, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: IRQ-GIC: Add support for routable
irqs
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Sricharan R wrote:
> @@ -700,11 +709,22 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> *out_hwirq = intspec[1] + 16;
>
> /* For SPIs, we need to add 16 more to get the GIC irq ID number */
> - if (!intspec[0])
> + if (!intspec[0]) {
> *out_hwirq += 16;
Minor nit. This should be in the default implementation. The crossbar
implementation will fill out_hwirq in its own way and is not
interested in the +16 operation at all.
> + ret = gic_routable_irq_domain_ops->xlate(d, controller,
> + intspec,
> + intsize,
> + out_hwirq,
> + out_type);
> +
> + gic->domain = irq_domain_add_legacy(node, gic_irqs, irq_base,
> + hwirq_base, &gic_irq_domain_ops, gic);
> + } else {
> + if (WARN_ON(!gic_routable_irq_domain_ops))
> + return;
This warning is pointless, because you have default ops now.
> +
> + gic->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, nr_routable_irqs,
> + &gic_irq_domain_ops,
> + gic);
> }
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists