lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:02:35 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding


On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 10/30/13 14:56, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> 
>>> On 10/30/13 14:45, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>> +l2-cache node containing the following properties:
>>>> Is the L1 interrupt not per core L1 cache (even if they are OR together at PIC)?
>>> Yes it is per CPU. That is what the 0xf part of the cpus interrupts
>>> property is showing.
>> Than why not have it in each cpu node?
> 
> Because that duplicates things unnecessarily? The cpus node can hold
> things that are common to all CPUs to avoid duplication. If it was a
> different PPI for each CPU then I would agree that we need to put it in
> each cpu node.

Ok, I'll accept that as the binding is specific to Krait (and I assume all SoCs w/Krait wire this up to a common interrupt)

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ