linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131031173047.GK21983@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:30:47 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding

On 10/30, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> 
> > On 10/30/13 14:56, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On 10/30/13 14:45, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>>> +l2-cache node containing the following properties:
> >>>> Is the L1 interrupt not per core L1 cache (even if they are OR together at PIC)?
> >>> Yes it is per CPU. That is what the 0xf part of the cpus interrupts
> >>> property is showing.
> >> Than why not have it in each cpu node?
> > 
> > Because that duplicates things unnecessarily? The cpus node can hold
> > things that are common to all CPUs to avoid duplication. If it was a
> > different PPI for each CPU then I would agree that we need to put it in
> > each cpu node.
> 
> Ok, I'll accept that as the binding is specific to Krait (and I assume all SoCs w/Krait wire this up to a common interrupt)
> 

Can I take that as an ack? I'll resend with the s/an/a/ fix
today.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/