linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <C796381F-AE3B-4577-BC97-DA041E5F40E8@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:44:39 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding


On Oct 31, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 10/30, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> 
>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> 
>>> On 10/30/13 14:56, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/30/13 14:45, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>>>> +l2-cache node containing the following properties:
>>>>>> Is the L1 interrupt not per core L1 cache (even if they are OR together at PIC)?
>>>>> Yes it is per CPU. That is what the 0xf part of the cpus interrupts
>>>>> property is showing.
>>>> Than why not have it in each cpu node?
>>> 
>>> Because that duplicates things unnecessarily? The cpus node can hold
>>> things that are common to all CPUs to avoid duplication. If it was a
>>> different PPI for each CPU then I would agree that we need to put it in
>>> each cpu node.
>> 
>> Ok, I'll accept that as the binding is specific to Krait (and I assume all SoCs w/Krait wire this up to a common interrupt)
>> 
> 
> Can I take that as an ack? I'll resend with the s/an/a/ fix
> today.

Yes, you can take that as an ack.

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/