linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: print microcode revision on PEBs errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131031081507.GA8922@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:15:07 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: print microcode revision on PEBs errors


* Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Sandy bridge CPUs with old microcode, PEBs
> fails and suggests a microcode update.
> Print out the required and the actual revision to
> make it easier to figure out what's wrong.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index f31a165..81f2789 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -2105,6 +2105,8 @@ static int intel_snb_pebs_broken(int cpu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	pr_info("PEBS checking: microcode 0x%x min legal 0x%x\n",
> +		cpu_data(cpu).microcode, rev);

That's not a very informative message though.

Something like:

   "x86/perf/intel: PEBS turned off due to too old microcode version 0x%x\n"
   "x86/perf/intel: Minimum required microcode version for PEBS: 0x%x\n"

would work better I think.

Also, only output this once, and only output it if the check 
_fails_.

>  	return (cpu_data(cpu).microcode < rev);

Btw., please also fix the return statement, it doesn't need 
parentheses.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/