[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075153861@IN01WEMBXA.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 05:45:48 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul Gortmaker" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
realmz paranoid <realmz6@...il.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org"
<uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: *: remove '__init' for setup_profiling_timer()
On 10/23/2013 07:36 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Most of architectures not use '__init' for setup_profiling_timer(), so
> need remove it, or can generate warning (e.g. arc with allmodconfig):
>
> MODPOST vmlinux.o
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3c682): Section mismatch in reference from the function write_profile() to the function .init.text:setup_profiling_timer()
> The function write_profile() references
> the function __init setup_profiling_timer().
> This is often because write_profile lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of setup_profiling_timer is wrong.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
> ---
> arch/arc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c | 2 +-
> arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> index bca3052..3bdac11 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
> /*
> * not supported here
> */
> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
> index 11789be..3bef058 100644
> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ void __init platform_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> init_cpu_present(&mask);
> }
>
> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
> index 8a252f2..2e8cd36 100644
> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> -int __init
> +int
> setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
In theory this change is OK. However this is legacy code at best and it would be
better to define a weak definition in kernel/profile.c and remove this cruft from
relevant arches. I'll send out a patch.
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists