lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 31 Oct 2013 05:45:48 +0000
From:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@....de>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Paul Gortmaker" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	realmz paranoid <realmz6@...il.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org" 
	<uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: *: remove '__init' for setup_profiling_timer()

On 10/23/2013 07:36 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Most of architectures not use '__init' for setup_profiling_timer(), so
> need remove it, or can generate warning (e.g. arc with allmodconfig):
>
>     MODPOST vmlinux.o
>   WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3c682): Section mismatch in reference from the function write_profile() to the function .init.text:setup_profiling_timer()
>   The function write_profile() references
>   the function __init setup_profiling_timer().
>   This is often because write_profile lacks a __init
>   annotation or the annotation of setup_profiling_timer is wrong.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
> ---
>  arch/arc/kernel/smp.c          |    2 +-
>  arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c |    2 +-
>  arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c       |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> index bca3052..3bdac11 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>  /*
>   * not supported here
>   */
> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>  {
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
> index 11789be..3bef058 100644
> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ void __init platform_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>  	init_cpu_present(&mask);
>  }
>  
> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>  {
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
> index 8a252f2..2e8cd36 100644
> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> -int __init
> +int
>  setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>  {
>  	return -EINVAL;

In theory this change is OK. However this is legacy code at best and it would be
better to define a weak definition in kernel/profile.c and remove this cruft from
relevant arches. I'll send out a patch.

-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ