[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5271F4A9.40804@asianux.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:11:53 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
CC: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
realmz paranoid <realmz6@...il.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org"
<uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: *: remove '__init' for setup_profiling_timer()
On 10/31/2013 01:45 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 07:36 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Most of architectures not use '__init' for setup_profiling_timer(), so
>> need remove it, or can generate warning (e.g. arc with allmodconfig):
>>
>> MODPOST vmlinux.o
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3c682): Section mismatch in reference from the function write_profile() to the function .init.text:setup_profiling_timer()
>> The function write_profile() references
>> the function __init setup_profiling_timer().
>> This is often because write_profile lacks a __init
>> annotation or the annotation of setup_profiling_timer is wrong.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>> index bca3052..3bdac11 100644
>> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>> /*
>> * not supported here
>> */
>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> index 11789be..3bef058 100644
>> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ void __init platform_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>> init_cpu_present(&mask);
>> }
>>
>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>> index 8a252f2..2e8cd36 100644
>> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>> -int __init
>> +int
>> setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> In theory this change is OK. However this is legacy code at best and it would be
> better to define a weak definition in kernel/profile.c and remove this cruft from
> relevant arches. I'll send out a patch.
>
That sounds good to me.
> -Vineet
>
>
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists