[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383422109.4378.15.camel@x220.thuisdomein>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:55:09 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
Cc: Martin Walch <walch.martin@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [kconfig] update: results of some syntactical checks
On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 17:40 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:20:54 +0100
> Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> escreveu:
> > Those are obvious typos. Still present in v3.12-rc7. Perhaps you'd like
> > to send the trivial patch to fix this?
>
> Yes, it is a typo...
>
> > > Probably, it was meant to say something like
> > > > depends on SMS_USB_DRV = SMS_SDIO_DRV
>
> But this is not the right thing to do. The Kconfig logic here is that it
> should depends on !SMS_SDIO_DRV or SMS_USB_DRV = SMS_SDIO_DRV.
For the record: my reason for suggesting to Martin to send patches is
that sending a (trivial) patch often turns out to be a quick way to get
issues like that resolved. Maintainers seem to react quite quickly on
patches. Perhaps even faster if a patch is not solving the issue at hand
entirely correct! Messages like Martin's, that basically state that
there are one or more tree-wide problems, seem to be overlooked easily.
> I remember I made a patch like that while testing some things with this
> driver, but it seems that I forgot to push. I might have it somewhere on
> my test machine.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists