[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52774801.6030207@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:38:49 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Tomasz Stanislawski <t.stanislaws@...sung.com>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<kyungmin.park@...sung.com>, <t.figa@...sung.com>,
<sw0312.kim@...sung.com>, <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
<rahul.sharma@...sung.com>, <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
<s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
<mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/12] phy: Add simple-phy driver
Hi,
On Friday 25 October 2013 01:21 PM, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
> Hi,
> Please refer to the comments below.
>
> On 10/24/2013 05:52 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Monday 21 October 2013 07:48 PM, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>>> Add simple-phy driver to support a single register
>>> PHY interfaces present on Exynos4 SoC.
>>
>> How are these PHY interfaces modelled in the SoC? Where does the register
>> actually reside?
>
> Initially, I was planning to add PHY for HDMI_PHY register in
> power management register set on s5pv310 soc.
If that register is part of the power management register space, I don't
think it justifies creating a PHY driver for it.
>
> However other PHYs use very similar interface (setting bit 0).
> This includes DAC_PHY, ADC_PHY, PCIe_PHY, SATA_PHY.
> Moreover it suits well to USBDEVICE_PHY, USBHOST_PHY.
How is it currently being done for these drivers? Is it being done in
the patches sent by Kamil or Vivek?
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists