[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <527890A5.8050507@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:31:01 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <prarit@...hat.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Allow NR_CPUS=1024
On 2013/11/5 14:25, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/04/2013 12:11 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 8192 maybe?
>>>
>>> Yeah, that makes more sense I guess.
>>>
>>
>> However, I still have serious issues with crap like this because
>> randconfig is basically broken. If nothing else we need to get that
>> feedback to the kconfig maintainers.
>
> The problem with that is that there are no kconfig maintainers:
>
Yes, there is.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/30/124
Though I don't know if the new maintainer will help in this issue.
> KCONFIG
> ...
> S: Odd Fixes
>
> The kconfig code is still a hard to maintain, scarcely documented mess. It
> took us almost a decade to rescue the NTP code from a similar obfuscation
> trap and make it maintainable. It had the same author as the original
> Kconfig code - and the Kconfig code is 10 times larger than the NTP code.
>
> Thanks,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists