linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] get_maintainer: Improve "Author:" rolestats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <527891F9.8040100@asianux.com>
Date:	Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:36:41 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	Chen Gang F T <chen.gang.flying.transformer@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] get_maintainer: Improve "Author:" rolestats

On 11/05/2013 02:16 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 14:04 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 11/05/2013 01:54 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 13:45 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>>> If really as what I guess above (some patches no Signed-of-by), is there
>>>>> a tool to check and find this issue in time?
>>> scripts/checkpatch.pl bleats a message on missing sign-offs.
>>
>> Yeah, the author/maintainer can use it for checking.
>>
>> But do we have additional tools to let the version tree integrator (e.g.
>> sfr) notice about it?
> 
> git pre-commit hooks work.
> 
> btw: there's some development efforts going on
>      that might help here eventually.
> 
> Read this thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/26/158
> 

OK, thanks. It seems it is about commit one patch, and it also seems no
"git pre-commit" command (my git version is "git version 1.7.7.6").

And do we have a tool to type a command to check all patches whether
missing sign-offs? (I guess, the version integrator need not check patch
one by one only for whether contents sign-offs).

Oh, I forgot one thing, the original "scripts/get_maintainers.pl" (e.g.
in next-20130927), it is already smart enough. So can we treat our patch
as the fix patch for the latest changes?


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/