linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8tZTm9bh+arQ+uFyTVHxfdf07bWaM_Sdqo08TO=UCMMUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:45:13 +0530
From:	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Alex Elder <alex.elder@...aro.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com" 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

Hi Linus,

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad
> <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar
>>> <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in
>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now?
>>>
>> Yes it needs too.
>
> But on top of *what* exactly?
>
> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and
> not even on the mainline kernel.
>
Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier
patches have  gone via ARM tree itself [1].
If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree.

> Is this something that should go on top of the davinci
> GPIO patch set that is still being elaborated on?
>
Nope.

[1]  http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg275267.html

Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/