linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <527A1EC7.20400@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:19:43 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com" 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Alex Elder <alex.elder@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

On Wednesday 06 November 2013 03:45 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad
>> <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar
>>>> <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in
>>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now?
>>>>
>>> Yes it needs too.
>>
>> But on top of *what* exactly?
>>
>> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and
>> not even on the mainline kernel.
>>
> Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier
> patches have  gone via ARM tree itself [1].
> If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree.

The dependent patches are all in linux-next through ARM SoC queued for
v3.13 merge. This fix can either be sent late in merge cycle once Linus
has pulled ARM SoC or after v3.13-rc1 comes out.

Thanks,
Sekhar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/