linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: add strictlimit knob

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <527A5269.7040900@parallels.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 18:30:01 +0400
From:	Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	<karl.kiniger@....ge.com>, <jack@...e.cz>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <t.artem@...os.com>,
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <tytso@....edu>,
	<fengguang.wu@...el.com>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add strictlimit knob

Hi Andrew,

On 11/05/2013 02:01 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:31:40 +0400 Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@...allels.com> wrote:
>
>> "strictlimit" feature was introduced to enforce per-bdi dirty limits for
>> FUSE which sets bdi max_ratio to 1% by default:
>>
>> http://www.http.com//article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/105809
>>
>> However the feature can be useful for other relatively slow or untrusted
>> BDIs like USB flash drives and DVD+RW. The patch adds a knob to enable the
>> feature:
>>
>> echo 1 > /sys/class/bdi/X:Y/strictlimit
>>
>> Being enabled, the feature enforces bdi max_ratio limit even if global (10%)
>> dirty limit is not reached. Of course, the effect is not visible until
>> max_ratio is decreased to some reasonable value.
> I suggest replacing "max_ratio" here with the much more informative
> "/sys/class/bdi/X:Y/max_ratio".
>
> Also, Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-bdi will need an update
> please.

OK, I'll update it, fix patch description and re-send the patch.

>
>>   mm/backing-dev.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>
> I'm not really sure what to make of the patch.  I assume you tested it
> and observed some effect.  Could you please describe the test setup and
> the effects in some detail?

I plugged 16GB USB-flash in a node with 8GB RAM running 3.12.0-rc7 and 
started writing a huge file by "dd" (from /dev/zero to USB-flash 
mount-point). While writing I was observing "Dirty" counter as reported 
by /proc/meminfo. As expected it stabilized on a level about 1.2GB (15% 
of total RAM). Immediately after dd completed, the "umount" command took 
about 5 minutes. This corresponded to 5MB write throughput of the flash 
drive.

Then I repeated the experiment after setting tunables:

echo 1 > /sys/class/bdi/8\:16/max_ratio
echo 1 > /sys/class/bdi/8\:16/strictlimit

This time, "Dirty" counter became 100 times lesser - about 12MB and 
"umount" took about a second.

Thanks,
Maxim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/