linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 01/11] rbtree: Fix rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1383788572-25938-2-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed,  6 Nov 2013 17:42:30 -0800
From:	Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	EXT4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] rbtree: Fix rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() iterator

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

The iterator rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() relies on pointer
underflow behavior when testing for loop termination. In particular
it expects that
  &rb_entry(NULL, type, field)->field
is NULL. But the result of this expression is not defined by a C standard
and some gcc versions (e.g. 4.3.4) assume the above expression can never
be equal to NULL. The net result is an oops because the iteration is not
properly terminated.

Fix the problem by modifying the iterator to avoid pointer underflows.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rbtree.h | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rbtree.h b/include/linux/rbtree.h
index aa870a4..57e75ae 100644
--- a/include/linux/rbtree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rbtree.h
@@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ static inline void rb_link_node(struct rb_node * node, struct rb_node * parent,
 	*rb_link = node;
 }
 
+#define rb_entry_safe(ptr, type, member) \
+	({ typeof(ptr) ____ptr = (ptr); \
+	   ____ptr ? rb_entry(____ptr, type, member) : NULL; \
+	})
+
 /**
  * rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe - iterate over rb_root in post order of
  * given type safe against removal of rb_node entry
@@ -95,12 +100,9 @@ static inline void rb_link_node(struct rb_node * node, struct rb_node * parent,
  * @field:	the name of the rb_node field within 'type'.
  */
 #define rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(pos, n, root, field) \
-	for (pos = rb_entry(rb_first_postorder(root), typeof(*pos), field),\
-		n = rb_entry(rb_next_postorder(&pos->field), \
-			typeof(*pos), field); \
-	     &pos->field; \
-	     pos = n, \
-		n = rb_entry(rb_next_postorder(&pos->field), \
-			typeof(*pos), field))
+	for (pos = rb_entry_safe(rb_first_postorder(root), typeof(*pos), field); \
+	     pos && ({ n = rb_entry_safe(rb_next_postorder(&pos->field), \
+			typeof(*pos), field); 1; }); \
+	     pos = n)
 
 #endif	/* _LINUX_RBTREE_H */
-- 
1.8.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/