[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:11:31 -0800
From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mpn@...gle.com>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: f_fs: remove loop from I/O function
Hi Michal,
On 11/10/2013 08:50 AM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
>
> When endpoint changes (due to it being disabled or alt setting changed),
> mimic the action as if the change happened after the request has been
> queued, instead of retrying with the new endpoint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/f_fs.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/f_fs.c
> index 44cf775..f875f26 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/f_fs.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/f_fs.c
> @@ -754,74 +754,61 @@ static ssize_t ffs_epfile_io(struct file *file,
> {
> struct ffs_epfile *epfile = file->private_data;
> struct ffs_ep *ep;
> - char *data = NULL;
> ssize_t ret;
> + char *data;
You can't non-initialize data, otherwise we'll end up with this correct
warning:
drivers/usb/gadget/f_fs.c:866:7: warning: 'data' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
If you agree, you can send v5.1 to my 5th patch set (or let me handle
it).
Br, David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists