[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1384267842.24631.3.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:50:42 -0500
From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] arm: use generic fixmap.h
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 08:22 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/fixmap.h | 25 ++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Okay, this one is wrong. I just noticed that arm is different
from other architectures in that increasing fixed indices
convert to increasing virt addresses. Does this need to be
the case or is it okay to change it to match other architectures?
--Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists