[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528193A0.7050505@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:34:08 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions
On 11/09/13 21:03, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Bah..... NAK. We are doing runtime patching of the kernel for many
> many things already. So why not do the same here?
static keys are a form of runtime patching, albeit not as extreme as
you're suggesting.
>
> The obvious strategy is to simply overwrite the start of the existing
> __aeabi_idiv code with the "sdiv r0, r0, r1" and "bx lr" opcodes.
>
> Similarly for the unsigned case.
I was thinking the same thing when I wrote this, but I didn't know how
to tell the compiler to either inline this function or to let me inilne
an assembly stub with some section magic.
>
> That let you test the hardware capability only once during boot instead
> of everytime a divide operation is performed.
The test for hardware capability really isn't done more than once during
boot. The assembly is like so at compile time
00000000 <__aeabi_idiv>:
0: nop {0}
4: b 0 <___aeabi_idiv>
8: sdiv r0, r0, r1
c: bx lr
and after we test and find support for the instruction it will be
replaced with
00000000 <__aeabi_idiv>:
0: b 8
4: b 0 <___aeabi_idiv>
8: sdiv r0, r0, r1
c: bx lr
Unfortunately we still have to jump to this function. It would be great
if we could inline this function at the call site but as I already said
I don't know how to do that.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists