[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5281940C.3040705@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:35:56 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Måns Rullgård
<mans@...sr.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions
On 11/10/13 23:46, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:00:32PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/Makefile b/arch/arm/lib/Makefile
>> index bd454b0..38621729 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/lib/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/Makefile
>> @@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ lib-y := backtrace.o changebit.o csumipv6.o csumpartial.o \
>> io-readsb.o io-writesb.o io-readsl.o io-writesl.o \
>> call_with_stack.o
>>
>> +lib-$(CONFIG_CPU_V7) += div-v7.o
> CPU_V7M could make use of that, too.
> (If you follow Nico's advice to use runtime patching I cannot test it
> for you on v7-M though as my machine has to use an XIP kernel.)
>
It already is runtime patching so I suspect you won't be able to test it
anyway. I suppose we need another config like MIGHT_HAVE_IDIV or
something that both v7 and v7M select?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists