[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528413DE.1090203@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:05:50 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: jerry.hoemann@...com
CC: rob@...dley.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, matt.fleming@...el.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
penberg@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
vgoyal@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Early use of boot service memory
On 11/13/2013 03:57 PM, jerry.hoemann@...com wrote:
>
> I think i can go to a date based black list, that removes the manual
> step. System running firmware before certain date assumes we need
> to do the work around. If firmware is newer than that date, we don't
> use the workaround. Blacklist overrides and allows current behavior
> for new firmware that is subsequently found to be broken and for
> which we can't convenience the manufacturer to fix.
>
No, we can't, at least not for now. We are continually finding new
platforms with the bug.
>
> I will still point out that as currently used, efi_reserve_boot_services
> is wrong. A work around for firmware bugs on one platform shouldn't be
> breaking platforms that don't have that bug. Its just much less likely
> to cause problems with higher crash kernel allocation.
>
It is wrong, yes, but it seems like a ubiquitous problem.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists