[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131114114039.GA29277@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:40:39 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: zhang.yi20@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: kmod: avoid propagating PF_NO_SETAFFINITY into userspace child
On 11/14, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:51:47AM +0800, zhang.yi20@....com.cn wrote:
> > The kernel worker thread has the PF_NO_SETAFFINITY flag, and it is propagated
> > into the userspace child. Clearing this flag in usersapce child to enable its
> > migrating capability.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <zhang.yi20@....com.cn>
> >
> > --- linux3-12/kernel/kmod.c 2013-11-14 09:06:58.991781656 +0000
> > +++ linux3-12/kernel/kmod.c 2013-11-14 09:08:47.511781621 +0000
> > @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void
> > * Avoid propagating that into the userspace child.
> > */
> > set_user_nice(current, 0);
> > + current->flags &= ~PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
>
> I'm a bit confused. kernel_thread() doesn't use workqueue or
> kthread_bind(),
Yes, but kernel_thread() is called by the worker thread which has
PF_NO_SETAFFINITY, this flag is copied to child->flags.
Looks like Zhang is right... But I'd suggest to change flush_old_exec()
instead (see "current->flags &= ...").
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists