linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/1]: (Was: kmod: avoid propagating PF_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131114115551.GA30824@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:55:51 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	zhang.yi20@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1]: (Was: kmod: avoid propagating PF_NO_SETAFFINITY into
	userspace child)

On 11/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Yes, but kernel_thread() is called by the worker thread which has
> PF_NO_SETAFFINITY, this flag is copied to child->flags.

Hmm, and it seems that create_worker() needs a minor fix, please see
the patch.

> Looks like Zhang is right... But I'd suggest to change flush_old_exec()
> instead (see "current->flags &= ...").

Yes.


But... May be we should (also?) change copy_flags() to clear
PF_NO_SETAFFINITY? Probably not, this can lead to the subtle behaviour
changes. But I am wondering if there is any kthread() which relies on
PF_NO_SETAFFINITY copied by kernel_thread().

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/