[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8ORgnhPpt-mK2cghiP5CpjSQ=L5JwvMu+wYMaDU7xbtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:14:22 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"steve.capper@...aro.org" <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: advertise CPU features for modalias matching
On 14 November 2013 16:29, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:19:35AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> +ssize_t arch_print_cpu_modalias(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int caps;
>> + ssize_t n;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * With 32 features maximum (taking 5 bytes each to print), we don't
>> + * need to worry about overrunning the PAGE_SIZE sized buffer.
>> + */
>> + n = sprintf(buf, "cpu:type:arm64:feature:");
>
> I would use "aarch64" here instead of arm64 for consistency with the
> architecture mode, compiler triplet and ELF_PLATFORM definition in the
> kernel.
OK, I will change that.
Regards,
Ard,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists