[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52850A12.3090900@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:36:18 -0800
From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: matthew.garrett@...ula.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.ernst@...ux.intel.com,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ipc: Added support for IPC interrupt mode
Hi Alan,
[snip]
> So I think
>
> 1. Pass the informatio upon whether IRQ mode should be used in the
> platform information and remove all the ifdeffery
I will double check with Sathya. But in case polling mode is left for
development purpose, make we can create a static variable to set irq
mode or not.
> 2. Log timeouts
Agreed.
> 3. Explain what happens on a timeout that allows you to issue further
> commands without a race - eg do you need to do any kind of reset or will
> the next command issue stall sufficiently etc ?
I'll check with Sathya.
Thanks,
David Cohen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists