linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] ipc: Added support for IPC interrupt mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131114210015.25dab122@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:00:15 +0000
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	matthew.garrett@...ula.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.ernst@...ux.intel.com,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ipc: Added support for IPC interrupt mode

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:36:18 -0800
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Alan,
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > So I think
> >
> > 1. Pass the informatio upon whether IRQ mode should be used in the
> > platform information and remove all the ifdeffery
> 
> I will double check with Sathya. But in case polling mode is left for
> development purpose, make we can create a static variable to set irq
> mode or not.

If its only for development it doesn't IMHO need to be upstream. If its
useful for debug and/or needed on real chipsets (as I believe is the case
for the older ones) then a module (and thus kernel command line) option
would be sensible yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/