linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131116182328.GJ18306@pd.tnic>
Date:	Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:23:28 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, Frank Becker <fb@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:10:05AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ahh. Yes. Googling for "hetzner online spam", and there's a *lot* of
> complaints. See for example
> 
>    http://www.spamrankings.net/rankv2/2013/09/01/monthly/world/volume/cbl/all/regular/

Yowza, this is just great! :-(

> which puts it #2 _worldwide_ in September. I have no idea how accurate
> that is, but..

And they were #3 in August. So a steady rise ...

> I would suggest everybody who uses hetzner actively drop them, and
> talk publicly about *why* they drop them. Your business may not be all
> that lucrative to them (compared to the spam), but still..

Yeah, I hear they're not that great otherwise either, regardless of how
they handle (or not) spam.

@Frank, we need to have a serious talk, you and I :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/