| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMP44s1RsbDH11VQziLcZEQXM_QH3B_xQ7nkK9moSx0rv7PbzQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:46:53 -0600 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] panic: setup panic_timeout early On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote: > * Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com> wrote: > Anyway, the fact that you are argumentative even with Linus gives me > little hope that you will improve your communication patterns with > _me_, so I'm personally done arguing with you. How am I being argumentative? I avoided all arguments. >> You don't want to argue? Then don't argue. Apply the patch. [...] > > *Plonk*. This is exactly the opposite of what is conducive to less argumentation. If you are not going to comment on the patch, then don't say anything. The patch is good, and the fact that both you and Linus are avoiding any comments in the patch itself doesn't speak well for your intentions to avoid argumentation. So I ask you again. Do you see something wrong with the patch? -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists