linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: Constify struct mfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWKi9oPJnn92ARAZG6qnFgxwfBrKCLnYdVv8MNUVjJCyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:33:30 +0100
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Constify struct mfd_cell where possible

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> In the interests of bisectability and revertability, I'd prefer one
> patch per file-change where possible please. Or at the very least in
> groups of files, so one for tps*, another one for max*, etc.

Done. More SoB-credits for me ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/