linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: Constify struct mfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131118142811.GK13640@lee--X1>
Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:28:11 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Constify struct mfd_cell where possible

On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > In the interests of bisectability and revertability, I'd prefer one
> > patch per file-change where possible please. Or at the very least in
> > groups of files, so one for tps*, another one for max*, etc.
> 
> Done. More SoB-credits for me ;-)

You're welcome. :)

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/