[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131118182207.GA12569@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:22:07 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sukadev@...ibm.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, mszeredi@...e.cz,
serge.hallyn@...onical.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] autofs4: allow autofs to work outside the initial
PID namespace
On 11/18, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> It might be sufficient to surround the contents of show_options() with a
> lock on wq_mutex and update the check at the top to
>
> "lock; if (!sbi || sbi->catatonic) {unlock, return 0; } ..."
Or perhaps you can add synchronize_rcu() after swap(oz_pgrp, new_pid),
then show_options() can use rcu_read_lock().
This makes me think that we want put_pid_rcu() but I do not see a
simple way to implement it without synchronize_rcu or kmalloc...
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists