linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the pm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:52:13 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the pm tree

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c between commit 7b1998116bbb ("ACPI / driver core:
> Store an ACPI device pointer in struct acpi_dev_node") from the pm tree
> and commit f760f1967ee8 ("gpiolib: use dedicated flags for GPIO
> properties") from the gpio tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

Oh I never saw that patch before ... anyway it seems to be
correct, thanks.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/