[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXvn2GigpnH020XA1JvtF=4ZxwrOF4T=ocGgjhrcbWkgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:36:28 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] asm/types.h: Remove include/asm-generic/int-l64.h
Hi Arnd,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 November 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Now all 64-bit architectures have been converted to int-ll64.h, we can
>> remove int-l64.h in kernelspace.
>>
>> For backwards compatibility, alpha, ia64, mips64, and powerpc64 still use
>> int-l64.h in userspace.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Thanks!
>> Since <asm/types.h> (from include/uapi/asm-generic/types.h) is used for
>> both kernel and user space, include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h cannot just
>> become include/asm-generic/types.h, as Arnd suggested.
>
> I'm pretty sure you are right with this, but I don't remember at all
> what I suggested and don't understand what the problem (if any) is.
> Can you remind me?
Me neither :-(
You said https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/13/109, and Al's umode_t
consolidation has been completed.
I think it had to do with include/uapi/asm-generic/types.h including
<asm-generic/int-ll64.h>. Let's try...
In userspace, it will include <asm-generic/int-ll64.h> from uapi to get
e.g. __u32.
In kernelspace, it will include plain <asm-generic/int-ll64.h> (to get e.g.
u32), which will in turn include <uapi/asm-generic/int-ll64.h> (to also
get e.g. __u32).
As there's only include/uapi/asm-generic/types.h, but not
include/asm-generic/types.h (the individual architectures still have their
own asm/types.h), you cannot easily move (the contents of) int-ll64.h
to asm-generic/types.h for both the normal and uapi headers.
Does this make sense?
Note that this discussion is about what to do with the remaining int-ll64.h,
not about removing int-l64.h, which is what this patch is really about.
So _this_ patch can just go in.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists