linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] asm/types.h: Remove include/asm-generic/int-l64.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201311200137.20917.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:37:20 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	"Linux-Arch" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] asm/types.h: Remove include/asm-generic/int-l64.h

On Tuesday 19 November 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> > I'm pretty sure you are right with this, but I don't remember at all
> > what I suggested and don't understand what the problem (if any) is.
> > Can you remind me?
> 
> Me neither :-(
> You said https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/13/109, and Al's umode_t
> consolidation has been completed.
> 
> I think it had to do with include/uapi/asm-generic/types.h including
> <asm-generic/int-ll64.h>. Let's try...
> 
> In userspace, it will include <asm-generic/int-ll64.h> from uapi to get
> e.g. __u32.
> In kernelspace, it will include plain <asm-generic/int-ll64.h> (to get e.g.
> u32), which will in turn include <uapi/asm-generic/int-ll64.h> (to also
> get e.g. __u32).
> 
> As there's only include/uapi/asm-generic/types.h, but not
> include/asm-generic/types.h (the individual architectures still have their
> own asm/types.h), you cannot easily move (the contents of) int-ll64.h
> to asm-generic/types.h for both the normal and uapi headers.
> 
> Does this make sense?

I'm pretty sure I was not talking about include/uapi/asm-generic/types.h
there, and I still think we can just move include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h
to include/asm-generic/types.h but leave the uapi logic in place.

All architectures that do nothing but #include <asm-generic/int-ll64.h>
from asm/types.h at the moment can then remove their private file and
use the generic version, the others need to change to #include 
<asm-generic/types.h>.

You can no longer #include <uapi/asm-generic/types.h> from kernel space
after this change, since it refers to <asm-generic/int-ll64.h> which
now only exists in user space, but that's ok because it would be a bug
to include already (it defines the wrong types), and we don't.

> Note that this discussion is about what to do with the remaining int-ll64.h,
> not about removing int-l64.h, which is what this patch is really about.
> So _this_ patch can just go in.

Right.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/