linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: pinctrl: Add Broadcom Capri pinctrl driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYFOUoXwensdfQL=K7OEV=GioXj8AFxTSGukQH2A268BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:39:09 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Sherman Yin <syin@...adcom.com>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Matt Porter <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: pinctrl: Add Broadcom Capri pinctrl driver

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Sherman Yin <syin@...adcom.com> wrote:
> On 13-11-11 02:01 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>
>>> I would imagine that the platform-specific device tree bindings would
>>> need
>>> to clearly explain what the valid values are, as they should.
>>
>> But this is not a platform-specific binding. These are the
>> generic pin configuration bindings we're talking about.
>
> Yes, the properties are generic, but I was under the impression that the
> values can be "custom", such as these:

Well if it makes sense, we should try to make them non-custom.

And drivers should still try to be similar, if possible.

>> If you want arrays of booleans that is a matter for the OF core
>> parser I think.
>
> I was thinking of just using integers and accepting only 1 and 0, everything
> else is error.

Hm OK maybe. You need to talk to the OF people about that.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/