linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: at91/dt: add usb1 vbus and pullup pins

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <528CD9E4.7060501@overkiz.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:48:52 +0100
From:	boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
To:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC:	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: at91/dt: add usb1 vbus and pullup pins

On 20/11/2013 15:57, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 13:04 Wed 28 Aug     , Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> Add vbus and pullup pinctrl definitions.
>> Request the vbus and pullup pins in usb1 node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek.dts |   15 +++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek.dts
>> index 37b0880..76f3e87 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek.dts
>> @@ -29,6 +29,18 @@
>>   
>>   	ahb {
>>   		apb {
>> +			pinctrl@...ff400 {
>> +				usb1 {
>> +					pinctrl_usb1_vbus: usb1_vbus-0 {
>> +						atmel,pins = <AT91_PIOD 4 AT91_PERIPH_GPIO AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>;
>> +					};
> it's a gpio no-need

Okay, noted.

I thought I had to declare gpio configured pins in order to detect pin 
conflicts.
But after taking a closer look at the pinctrl core and at91 pinctrl 
driver, it seems this is automatically done
by means of the pinctrl_request_gpio function.


>> +
>> +					pinctrl_usb1_pullup: usb1_pullup-0 {
>> +						atmel,pins = <AT91_PIOD 5 AT91_PERIPH_GPIO AT91_PINCTRL_MULTI_DRIVE>;
>> +					};
> no-need multidrive

Then why is it configured with multi-drive option in the board file
( 
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-rm9200ek.c#L166) 
?

>> +				};
>> +			};
>> +
>>   			dbgu: serial@...ff200 {
>>   				status = "okay";
>>   			};
>> @@ -56,6 +68,9 @@
>>   
>>   			usb1: gadget@...b0000 {
>>   				atmel,vbus-gpio = <&pioD 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +				pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +				pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usb1_vbus
>> +					     &pinctrl_usb1_pullup>;
>>   				status = "okay";
>>   			};
>>   
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/